Volume 6, Issue 2 (April 2020)
Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences 2020, 6(2): 65-71 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Aslani H, Tabrizi A, Safari M B. Meniscal injury rate and its clinical outcome in the knee fracture dislocation. Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences 2020; 6 (2) :65-71
URL: http://ijrabms.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-103-en.html
URL: http://ijrabms.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-103-en.html
Department of Orthopedic, Shohada Educational Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Tabriz, Iran , Ali.tab.ms@gmail.com
Abstract: (2449 Views)
Background & Aims: Treating fracture-dislocation of the knee is very complex and it is associated with several complications. Soft tissue damages are very common and ignoring them may affect the treatment results. The present study aimed at evaluating the incidence rates and the effect of meniscal injuries on the fracture-dislocation of the knee.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective-descriptive analytical study, 25 patients suffering from fracture-dislocation of the knee with types II-V damages, according to the Moore classification criterion, underwent open reduction, fracture fixation, and meniscal repair or debridement process. They were followed-up for two years.
Results: Anatomic reduction of articular surface was obtained in 95% of the cases. The joint range of motion (ROM) was near to normal in 70% of the cases, 25% of the patients experienced functional ROM following manipulation, and 5% of cases required quadricepsplasty. Meniscal damages were observed in all cases (100%). The mean Lysholm score was 65±3.2 in the patients who were treated with meniscal debridement, whereas in patients who underwent meniscal repair, mean lysholm score was significantly higher (76.4±4.6) (P=0.001). Painful knee was observed in 16 patients (64%), and the majority of patients who had their meniscus were debrided.
Conclusions: Meniscal damage is observed in all cases with knee dislocation fracture requiring repair or debridement. Reconstruction of the damaged meniscus plays an important role in the clinical outcome of patients.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective-descriptive analytical study, 25 patients suffering from fracture-dislocation of the knee with types II-V damages, according to the Moore classification criterion, underwent open reduction, fracture fixation, and meniscal repair or debridement process. They were followed-up for two years.
Results: Anatomic reduction of articular surface was obtained in 95% of the cases. The joint range of motion (ROM) was near to normal in 70% of the cases, 25% of the patients experienced functional ROM following manipulation, and 5% of cases required quadricepsplasty. Meniscal damages were observed in all cases (100%). The mean Lysholm score was 65±3.2 in the patients who were treated with meniscal debridement, whereas in patients who underwent meniscal repair, mean lysholm score was significantly higher (76.4±4.6) (P=0.001). Painful knee was observed in 16 patients (64%), and the majority of patients who had their meniscus were debrided.
Conclusions: Meniscal damage is observed in all cases with knee dislocation fracture requiring repair or debridement. Reconstruction of the damaged meniscus plays an important role in the clinical outcome of patients.
Type of Study: orginal article |
Subject:
Special
References
1. Yeh W.L, Tu Y.K, Su J.Y, Hsu R.W, Knee dislocation: treatment of high-velocity knee dislocation. J Trauma 1999; 4:693-701. [DOI:10.1097/00005373-199904000-00023] [PMID]
2. Yu J.S, Goodwin. D, Salonen D. Complete dislocation of knee: spectrum of associated soft-tissue injuries depicted by MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 16:135-9. [DOI:10.2214/ajr.164.1.7998526] [PMID]
3. Howells N.R. , Brunton L.R, Robinson J, Porteus A.J, Eldridge J.D, Murray J.R. Acute knee dislocation: An evidence based approach to the management of the multiligament injured knee. Injury 2011; 42:1198-204. [DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.018] [PMID]
4. Fanelli G.C, Orcutt D.R, Edson C.J. The Multiple-Ligament Injured Knee: Evaluation, Treatment, and Results. J Arthroscopic Related Surgery 2005; 21(4):471-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.01.001] [PMID]
5. Moore TM. Fracture--dislocation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981 ;( 156):128-40. [DOI:10.1097/00003086-198105000-00015]
6. Pelser P.. Controversies in the management of tibial plateau fractures. SAOJ 2010; 75-82. [Google Scholar]
7. Durakbasa M.O, Ülku K, Ermis M.N. Irreducible open posterolateral knee dislocation due to medial meniscus interposition. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2011; 45(5):382-6. [Google Scholar]
8. Gardner M.J, Yacoubian S, Geller D. The incidence of soft tissue injury in operative tibial plateau fractures: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 103 patients. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19:79-84. [DOI:10.1097/00005131-200502000-00002] [PMID]
9. Yacoubian S.V, Nevins R.T, Sallis J.G, Potter H.G, Lorich D.G. Impact of MRI on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2002; 16:632-7. [DOI:10.1097/00005131-200210000-00004] [PMID]
10. Fox M.G. MR imaging of the meniscus: review, current trends, and clinical implications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007; 15:103-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.mric.2007.02.004] [PMID]
11. Weigel D.P, Marsh J.L. High-energy fractures of the tibial plateau: knee function after longer follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84A:1541-51. [DOI:10.2106/00004623-200209000-00006] [PMID]
12. Shepherd L, Abdollahi K, Lee J, Vangsness C.T. The prevalence of soft tissue injuries in nonoperative tibial plateau fractures as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Trauma 2002; 16:628-31. [DOI:10.1097/00005131-200210000-00003] [PMID]
13. Wirbel RJ, Vrabac C, Pohlemann T, Hopp S. Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability for AO / ASIF and Moore Classification of Tibial Plateau Fractures - A Retrospective Study. Ann Orthop Rheumatol 2015; 3(2): 1048. [Address]
14. Aronson D, Singer R, Higgiris R. Skeletal traction for fractures of the femoral shaft in children. J Bone Joint Surg 1987; 69-A: 1435-8. [DOI:10.2106/00004623-198769090-00018]
15. Porat S, Milgrom C, Nyska M. Femoral fracture treatment in head injured children: use of external fixation. J Trauma 1986; 26: 81-4. [DOI:10.1097/00005373-198601000-00015] [PMID]
16. Aronson J, Tursky E.A. External fixation of femur fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1992; 12: 157-63. [DOI:10.1097/01241398-199203000-00003] [PMID]
17. Beaty J.H, Austin S.M, Warner W.C. Interlocking intramedullary nailing of femoral-shaft fractures in adoles- cents: preliminary results and complications. J Pediatr Orthop 1994; 14:178-83. [DOI:10.1097/01241398-199403000-00009] [PMID]
18. Mustonen A.O.T, Koivikko M.P, Lindahl J, Koskinen S.K. MRI of Acute Meniscal Injury Associated with Tibial Plateau Fractures: Prevalence, Type, and Location. AJR 2008; 191:1002-9. [DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3811] [PMID]
19. Eranki V, Begg C, Wallace ,. Outcomes of Operatively Treated Acute Knee Dislocations. Open Orthopaedics J 2010, 4, 22-30. [DOI:10.2174/1874325001004010022] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Stannard J.P, Lopez R, Volgas D. Soft tissue injury of the knee after tibial plateau fractures. J Knee Surg 2010; 23(4):187-92. [DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1268694] [PMID]
21. Gardner M.J, Yacoubian S, Geller D, Suk M, Mintz D, Potter H, et al. The incidence of soft tissue injury in operative tibial plateau fractures: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 103 patients. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19(2):79-8. [DOI:10.1097/00005131-200502000-00002] [PMID]
22. Shepherd L, Abdollahi K, Lee J, Vangsness C.T. The Prevalence of Soft Tissue Injuries in Nonoperative Tibial Plateau Fractures as Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Orthopaedic Trauma 2002:16(9):628-31. [DOI:10.1097/00005131-200210000-00003] [PMID]
23. Vangsness J.r.C.T, Ghaderi B, Hohl M, Moore T.M. Arthroscopy of meniscal injuries with tibial plateau fractures. Bone and Joint Surgery J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994;76( 3): 488-90. [DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.76B3.8175862]
24. Almekinders L, Logan T. Results following treatment of traumatic dislocations of the knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 284:203-7. [DOI:10.1097/00003086-199211000-00028]
25. Frassica F.J, Sim F.H, Staebeli J.W. Dislocation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 991; 263:200-5. [DOI:10.1097/00003086-199102000-00024]
26. Harner C.D, Walirip R.L, Bennett C.H. Surgical management or knee dislocations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86A:262-73. [DOI:10.2106/00004623-200402000-00008] [PMID]
27. Liow R.Y, Mc Nicholas M.J, Keating J.R. Ligament repair and reconstruction in traumatic dislocation or the. Knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85B:845-51. [DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.85B6.13972]
28. Rios A, Villa A, Fahandezh H. Results arter treatment or traumatic knee dislocations: a report or 26 cases. J Trauma 2003; 55:489-94. [DOI:10.1097/01.TA.0000043921.09208.76] [PMID]
29. Moiugomery T, Savioe F, White J. Orthopedic management or knee dislocations: comparison of surgical reconstruction of surgical reconstruction and immobilization. Am J Knee Surg 1995; 8:97-103. [Pub Med]
30. Green RN, Pullagura MK, Holland JP. Irreducible fracture-dislocation of the knee. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2014;48(3):363-6. [DOI:10.3944/AOTT.2014.3112] [PMID]
31. Moore TM. Fracture-dislocation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;156:128-40. [DOI:10.1097/00003086-198105000-00015]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Contact Information
Address: Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Jahad Ave., Urmia, I.R. Iran. Post code: 57147-83734. P.O. Box. 1138
Email: ijrabms
gmail.com
rabmsumsu.ac.ir
Tel / Fax: +984431937332/+984432240642
