Ethics code: 1109/2021


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

J.Kharadi P, R.Gohil N, Solanki Y. Comparing intraocular pressures with different types of tonometers and its correlation with central corneal thickness in patients presenting in a tertiary care centre. Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences 2024; 10 (2) :146-153
URL: http://ijrabms.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-297-en.html
Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Government medical College, Bhavnagar, India , priyankakharadi94@gmail.com
Abstract:   (187 Views)
Background & Aims:  Glaucoma usually undiagnosed in general population. People usually ignores the symptoms and came late when disease already get worsened. This study aimed to compare intraocular pressures in general population having inclusion criteria with different types of tonometers and its correlation with central corneal thickness in patients presenting in OPD at Ophthalmology Department of Sir T hospital, Bhavnagar, Gujarat.
Materials & Methods: In this Hospital based cross-sectional observational study with 9-month duration, 72 patients between the ages of 30–75 years were evaluated, after taking into consideration the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Detailed history taken including chief complaints, past history, family history, personal history followed by general and systemic examination. 72 patients having inclusion exclusion criteria were analyzed with three different tonometers (Goldmann applanation, Non-contact tonometer (NCT), Schiotz tonometer), and the correlation between each other were measured. Then central corneal thickness is measured with OCT Tomography, and the results were compared to intraocular pressure (IOP).
Results:  When compared to the non-contact tonometer, we found that the Schiotz tonometer had the highest correlation. These associations were also seen in people with diabetes and hypertension. Nonetheless, as patients age, there is a corresponding rise in the correlation between the gold standard approach and the tonometer.
Conclusion:  All the tonometer showed significant correlation with the gold standard technique (Goldmann applanation tonometer), over a range of intra ocular pressure, between the ages of 30 -75 years, in diabetics and hypertensive patients, and in the patients with different CCT values.

 
Full-Text [PDF 322 kb]   (30 Downloads)    
Type of Study: orginal article | Subject: Other

References
1. Shields text book of Glaucoma. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. [URL]
2. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122(3):460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72088-4 [DOI:10.1016/S0002-9394(14)72088-4]
3. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014;121(11):2081-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 [DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013] [PMID]
4. Maurya RP. Glaucoma burden : Indian scenario. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017;3(4):387-8. [URL]
5. Kersey T, Clement CI, Bloom P, Cordeiro MF. New trends in glaucoma risk, diagnosis & management. Indian J Med Res 2013;137(4):659-68. [URL]
6. Fisher JH, Watson PG, Spaeth G. A new handheld air impulse tonometer. EYE 1988;2 ( Pt 3)(3):238-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.1988.48 [DOI:10.1038/eye.1988.48] [PMID]
7. Pearce CD, Kohl P, Yolton RL. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler PULSAIR 2000 tonometer. J Am Optom Assoc 1992;63(2):106-10. [Google Scholar]
8. Das S, Kumar L K. Comparative study of intraocular pressure measured by non-contact, rebound and Goldmann applanation tonometer and their correlation with corneal thickness and true IOP in a general population. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020;6(1):41-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2020.010 [DOI:10.18231/j.ijceo.2020.010]
9. Medeiros FA, Alencar LM, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, Susanna R Jr, Weinreb RN. The relationship between intraocular pressure reduction and rates of progressive visual field loss in eyes with optic disc hemorrhage. Ophthalmology 2010;117(11):2061-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.015 [DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.015] [PMID]
10. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38(1):1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(93)90053-a [DOI:10.1016/0039-6257(93)90053-A] [PMID]
11. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44(5):367-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00110-7 [DOI:10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7] [PMID]
12. Hagishima M, Kamiya K, Fujimura F, Morita T, Shoji N, Shimizu K. Effect of corneal astigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Arbeitsphysiologie 2010;248(2):257-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1202-7 [DOI:10.1007/s00417-009-1202-7] [PMID]
13. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115(5):592-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71455-2 [DOI:10.1016/S0002-9394(14)71455-2] [PMID]
14. Walia JS, Chronister CL. Possible iatrogenic transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease via tonometer tips: a review of the literature. Optometry 2001;72(10):649-52. [Google Scholar]
15. Chiara GF, Semes LP, Potter JW, Cutter GR, Tucker WR. Portablem tonometers: a clinical comparison of applanation and indentation device. J Am Optom Assoc 1989;60:105-10. [PMID]
16. Scheler A, Spoerl E, Boehm AG. Effect of diabetes mellitus on corneal biomechanics and measurement of intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol 2012;90(6):e447-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02437.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02437.x] [PMID]
17. Galgauskas S, Strupaite R, Strelkauskaite E, Asoklis R. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with different contact tonometers in young healthy persons. Int J Ophthalmol 2016;9(1):76-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2016.01.13 [DOI:10.18240/ijo.2016.01.13]
18. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, Bernardi P, Franco D, Perfetti I, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population. The Egna- NeumarktStudy. Ophthalmology 1998;105(2):209-15. [DOI:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)92665-3] [PMID]
19. Şenoldanea K, Ahmettaylanyazicib O. Correlation between hand preference and intraocular pressure from right- and left-eyes in right- and lefthanders. Vision Res 2003;43:405-8. [DOI:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00568-0] [PMID]
20. Ramm L, Herber R, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE, Terai N. Intraocular pressure measurements in diabetes mellitus. Eur J Ophthalmol 2020;30(6):1432-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1120672119890517 [DOI:10.1177/1120672119890517] [PMID]
21. Yasukawa T, Hanyuda A, Yamagishi K, Yuki K, Uchino M, Ozawa Y, et al. Relationship between blood pressure and intraocular pressure in the JPHC-NEXT eye study. Sci Rep 2022;12(1):17493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22301-1 [DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-22301-1] [PMID] []
22. Nagarajan S, Velayutham V, Ezhumalai G. Comparative evaluation of applanation and indentation tonometers in a community ophthalmology setting in Southern India. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2016;30(2):83-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2015.11.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.sjopt.2015.11.002] [PMID] []

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb