XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sheikhi S, Ram U, Derafshpour L. A Neuropsychological Study on Unconscious Information Processing when Receiving Affective and Non-Affective Visual Stimuli. Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences 2021; 7 (1) :53-61
URL: http://ijrabms.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-146-en.html
Neurophysiology research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran , leila_d56@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (1866 Views)
Background & Aims:  Throughout recent years, the study of unconscious visual processes has increased. Sufficient reductions of the stimulus presentation time are ways to achieve conditions of unawareness. Tachistoscopic experiments are used for this purpose. The recognition of affective word in tachistoscopic is due to the activation of the unconscious state. The main question in the present study was whether affective visual stimuli recognition during a computerized presentation could be influenced by unconscious interference.
Materials & Methods: The samples of 20 to 30 years were presented with affective and non-affective visual stimuli on the computer for one millisecond only.
Results: Results showed a significant difference between the recognition of affective and non-affective visual stimuli. Also, the spiritual and religious stimuli in comparison to other stimuli were significant as affective visual stimuli. Therefore the effectiveness of visual stimuli was an important variable. The results indicated a significant difference between males and females for recognizing non-affective visual stimuli.
Conclusion: It seems that inhibition in the subjects to recognize the affective visual stimuli could be due to inhibition in the retrieval processing in-memory system. According to results, males were better than females on the recall of prose passage details after listening to a single spoken presentation. This could also be related to the fact that males process faster and at a more superficial level than females.
Full-Text [PDF 404 kb]   (1067 Downloads)    
Type of Study: orginal article | Subject: General

1. Ansorge U, Kunde W, Kiefer M. Unconscious vision and executive control: How unconscious processing and conscious action control interact. Conscious Cogn 2014; 27: 268-87. [DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.009] [PMID]
2. Schultz DP, Schultz SE. A history of modern psychology. Cengage Learning; 2015. [Google Book]
3. Feldman RS. Understanding psychology. McGraw-Hill Education; 2014. [Google Book]
4. Pervin LA. The science of personality. Oxford University press; 2003. [Amazon]
5. Spear PD, Penrod SD, Baker TB. Psychology: Perspectives on behavior. John Wiley & Sons; 1988. [Amazon]
6. Corsini RJ, Ozaki BD. Encyclopedia of psychology. Wiley New York; 1994. [google scholar]
7. Sperling G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological monographs: General and applied 1960; 74: 1. [DOI:10.1037/h0093759]
8. Macphail EM. The evolution of consciousness. Oxford University Press; 1998. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198503248.001.0001]
9. Dehaene S, Changeux J-P. Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron 2011; 70: 200-27. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018] [PMID]
10. Kouider S, Dehaene S. Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2007; 362: 857-75. [DOI:10.1098/rstb.2007.2093] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Blum GS. Psychodynamics: The Science of Unconscious Mental Forces.Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1966.
12. Naccache L, Dehaene S. Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition 2001; 80: 215-29. [DOI:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00139-6]
13. Hockenbury DH, Hockenbury SE. Discovering psychology. Macmillan; 2001 [Google Book]
14. Roberts JE, Bell MA. Sex differences on a mental rotation task: variations in electroencephalogram hemispheric activation between children and college students. Developmental neuropsychology 2000; 17: 199-223. [DOI:10.1207/S15326942DN1702_04] [PMID]
15. Gohier B, Senior C, Brittain P, Lounes N, El-Hage W, Law V, et al. Gender differences in the sensitivity to negative stimuli: Cross-modal affective priming study. Eur Psychiatry 2013; 28: 74-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.06.007] [PMID]
16. Dimpfel W, Wedekind W, Keplinger I. Gender difference in electrical brain activity during presentation of various film excerpts with different emotional content. Eur J Med Res 2003; 8: 192-8. [google scholar]
17. Riding R, Rayner S. Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behavior. David Fulton Publishers; 2013. [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb