A comparative study of radiological and functional outcome of multidirectional locking nail with locking plate for management of distal Tibial Metaphyseal fractures

Mukherjee, Debojyoti; Deb, Hiranmay; Neog, Rituraj

doi:10.61186/rabms.9.3.161

Volume 9, Issue 3 (7-2023) Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences 2023, 9(3): 161-169 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.61186/rabms.9.3.161

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Mukherjee D, Deb H, Neog R. A comparative study of radiological and functional outcome of multidirectional locking nail with locking plate for management of distal Tibial Metaphyseal fractures. Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences 2023; 9 (3) :161-169
URL: http://ijrabms.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-237-en.html

A comparative study of radiological and functional outcome of multidirectional locking nail with locking plate for management of distal Tibial Metaphyseal fractures

Debojyoti Mukherjee

, Hiranmay Deb ^*

, Rituraj Neog

Department of Orthopaedics, R.G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata, India , haric02433@gmail.com

Abstract: (1196 Views)

Background & Aims: Road traffic accidents and high-energy injuries are the leading cause of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures. The management of tibial fractures remains controversial despite advances in non-operative and operative care. Plates and intramedullary nails are well-accepted and effective methods, but each has been historically related to complications. The present study compared the results of displaced extra-articular distal metaphyseal tibia fractures.
Materials & Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the department of orthopedics at R. G. Kar medical college and hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India on 27 Locking Plate the 27 Multidirectional Plate patients attending orthopedics and emergency room with a tibia fracture from January 2019 to August 2020. All patients with extra-articular distal tibial fracture without distal neurovascular deficit, closed injury, or Gustillo Anderson type 1 were included. Post-operatively, X-rays were taken of the surgical site, and a series of X-rays were taken at 4, 16, 24, and 36 weeks’ intervals. SPSS v.27 and GraphPad Prism v.5 along with statistical tests were used. P values below 0.05 were considered significant.
Results: In Locking Plate, 8(29.6%) patients were 21-30 years old, 10(37.0%) patients were 31-40 years old, and 9(33.3%) patients were 41-50 years old. In Multidirectional Nail, 6(22.2%) patients were 21-30 years old, 11(40.7%) patients were 31-40 years old, and 10(37.0%) patients were 41-50 years old. The Association of age with group was not statistically significant (p=0.8245). In Locking Plate, 11(40.7%) patients were female, and 16(59.3%) were male. In Multidirectional Nail, 10(37.0%) patients were female, and 17(63.0%) patients were male. The Association of sex with group was also not statistically significant (p=0.7801).
Conclusion: We found that Fair outcome was more in Multidirectional Nails compared to Locking Plate for the AAOS Lower limb questionnaire at four weeks, which was not statistically significant. It was found that the excellent outcome was more in Multidirectional Nails compared to Locking Plate for the AAOS Lower limb questionnaire at five weeks, which was not statistically significant.

Keywords: Distal Tibial Metaphyseal Fractures, Locking Plate, Multidirectional Locking Nail

Full-Text [PDF 246 kb] (282 Downloads) | | Full-Text (HTML) (280 Views)

Type of Study: orginal article | Subject: General

References

1. Schatzker J, Tile M. The Rationale of Operative Fracture Care. 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2005. pp. 475-6. [Google Scholar]

2. 2. Bucholz R, Court-Brown C, Rockwood C. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. New York: Lippincott; 2015. p. 98. [URL]

3. Müller M, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-61261-9]

4. Duda GN, Mandruzzato F, Heller M, Goldhahn J, Moser R, Hehli M, et al. Mechanical boundary conditions of fracture healing: Borderline indications in the treatment of unreamed tibial nailing. J Biomech 2001;34:639-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00237-2 [DOI:10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00237-2] [PMID]

5. Habernek H, Kwasny O, Schmid L, Ortner F. Complications of interlocking nailing for lower leg fractures: A 3-year follow up of 102 cases. J Trauma 1992;33:863-9. [DOI:10.1097/00005373-199212000-00012] [PMID]

6. Borrelli J, Jr, Prickett W, Song E, Becker D, Ricci W. Extraosseous blood supply of the tibia and the effects of different plating techniques: A human cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:691-5. [DOI:10.1097/00005131-200211000-00002] [PMID]

7. Blick SS, Brumback RJ, Lakatos R, Poka A, Burgess AR. Early bone grafting of high-energy tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;240:21-41. [DOI:10.1097/00003086-198903000-00005]

8. Newman SD, Mauffrey CP, Krikler S. Distal metadiaphyseal tibial fractures. Injury 2010;41(7):693-702. [DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.019] [PMID]

9. Jukka R, Flinkkilä T, Pekka H. Two-ring hybrid external fixation of distal tibial fractures: A review of 47 cases. J Trauma 2007;62(1):174-83. [DOI:10.1097/01.ta.0000215424.00039.3b] [PMID]

10. Trafton PG. Tibial shaft fracture. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, editors. Skeletal trauma. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1992. pp. 1771-1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-2220-6.10068-4 [DOI:10.1016/b978-1-4160-2220-6.10068-4]

11. Nork SE, Barei DP, Schildhauer TA, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, et al. Intramedullary nailing of proximal quarter tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20(8):523-8. [DOI:10.1097/01.bot.0000244993.60374.d6] [PMID]

12. Megas P, Zouboulis P, Papadopoulos AX, Karageorgos A, Lambiris E. Distal tibial fractures and non-:union:s treated with shortened intramedullary nail. Int Orthop 2003;27(6):348-51. [DOI:10.1007/s00264-003-0499-9] [PMID] []

13. Yang SW, Tzeng HM, Chou YJ, Teng HP, Liu HH, Wong CY. Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: Plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing. Injury 2006;37(6):531-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2005.09.013] [PMID]

14. Gorczyca JT, McKale J, Pugh K, et al. Modified tibial nails for treating distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:18-22. [DOI:10.1097/00005131-200201000-00004] [PMID]

15. Hansen M, El Attal R, Blum J, Blauth M, Rommens PM. Intramedullary nailing of the tibia with the expert tibia nail. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2009;21(6):620-35. [DOI:10.1007/s00064-009-2010-2] [PMID]

16. Ruedi T, Allgöwer M. Fractures of the lower end of the tibia into the ankle-joint. Orthop Trauma Dir 2009;7(05):25-9. [DOI:10.1055/s-0028-1100867]

17. Robinson CM, McLauchlan GJ, McLean IP, Court-Brown CM. Distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia with minimal involvement of the ankle. Classification and treatment by locked intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77(5):781-7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.77B5.7559711 [DOI:10.1302/0301-620x.77b5.7559711]

18. Ovadia DN, Beals RK. Fractures of the tibial plafond. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68(4):543-51. [DOI:10.2106/00004623-198668040-00010]